While the ruling class and the political class, represented in large part by President Santos, do not stand in the shoes of Colombian society and also listen to the international community, particularly in Latin America, true peace to the country will continue elusive and certainly distant horizon of reconciliation and coexistence for all and all Colombians.

Peace of Colombia, President Santos, requires listening to the various stakeholders and it is contrary to its strategy of ... "while the people interfere, the more difficult to achieve."

Peace of Colombia, President Santos can not be conducted with the narrow view, to defend the interests of big national and international capital:

First, because that way, the times you have tried, failed and the history of Colombia as well as notes.

Second, because the severity of the conflict that has over half a century without interruption, has spread to every corner of the country and has crossed borders and in particular that neither the state nor the successive governments have the exclusive monopoly of control and therefore have not achieved long term objectives.

Therefore we are of opinion, that the parties, we must listen to those interested in peace in Colombia, in its varied expressions and is thus a consensus output, which allows us to glimpse the new dawn of peace, social justice, democracy and sovereignty, prospects for a future of long breath.

Pretending peace today under the pretext of imposing "a monopoly of force" as state law, is because the state representing all the citizens and this is achieved in a new consensus, unlike the one worn mechanism elections clientelitas , illegal, corrupt and procedures through state terrorism.

Santos's government and its predecessors, are repetitive in the need for the insurgency make unilateral gestures as an expression of desire for peace.

The times that these gestures are made, have been underestimated, obscured and distorted by government officials and the media and used for political gain.

For the above are worn mechanisms that generate more than peace environments, cause greater distance.

Both the national government and the media, it applies a double standard, because they did not conceive that the insurgency could require the government unilateral gestures of peace, even though the state and its political regime, the perpetrators of violence affecting Colombia and it is this violence that the popular sectors have responded to the armed uprising.

Those looks biased and double meanings, are the most opposed to a real environment that allows you to find the ways of peace both Colombia needs.